The tech giant could be compelled to allow rival application marketplaces within the United Kingdom.

Placeholder image Illustration of app stores

The iPhone maker may have to allow rivals to operate their own app stores on Apple devices across Britain, after a ruling from the competition regulator.

This would be a major shift to Apple's well-known "closed system" where applications can only be installed from its own App Store.

But the Competition and Markets Authority has classified both the tech giants as having "strategic market status" - indicating they have significant control over smartphone ecosystems.

Regulatory Assessment

The regulator said the tech firms "may be limiting progress and competition".

But the authority emphasized it did not "determine or presume misconduct" from the firms.

"The app economy generates 1.5% of the UK's GDP and supports around four hundred thousand positions, which is why it's crucial these sectors function properly for business," commented a senior official from the CMA.

Around ninety to one hundred percent of UK mobile devices operate using the two tech companies' operating systems, creating what the authority calls an "virtual monopoly".

According to recent analysis, 48.5% of UK mobile owners own an Apple device - which runs Apple's iOS - with the overwhelming bulk of the remaining users using Google's Android.

Apple's Reaction

The CMA's investigation focused on how dominant Apple and Google's own apps are versus rivals - as well as their web applications and platform software.

It is unknown what modifications the authority will seek to implement, but earlier it published guidelines detailing possible actions it could take.

These include mandating it to be easier for people to switch between iOS and Android devices, and for both companies to list applications "fairly and openly" in their marketplaces.

Apple particularly may be compelled to permit third-party marketplaces on its products, and let people to install apps straight from developer sites.

This would follow a similar ruling in the European Union, which previously took action against Apple for anti-competitive behaviour.

The technology firm warned the UK could face delays to receiving updates - as has happened in the European Union - which the company blames on heavy regulation.

For instance, some AI features which have been rolled out in other parts of the world are not accessible in the EU.

"Apple faces fierce competition in every market where we operate, and we work tirelessly to create the finest offerings, services and customer interface," the organization said in a release.

"The UK's adoption of EU-style rules would weaken that, leaving users with weaker privacy and safety, slower availability to new features, and a divided, more complicated experience."

Google's Position

Android users can currently use alternative marketplaces - though critics say they are not as smooth as Google's own Play Store.

The CMA's roadmap said the search company may have to "modify the interface" of installing applications directly from websites, as well as "eliminate barriers" when using third-party platforms.

"There appears to be no the justification for today's designation decision," a company policy executive remarked.

The executive said "the majority" of Google device owners use third-party platforms or install applications straight from a creator's site, and asserted there is a far greater range of apps available for Android users versus those on Apple devices.

"Currently available are twenty-four thousand Android phone models from thirteen hundred phone manufacturers globally, facing intense competition from Apple's platform in the UK," the spokesperson continued.

Google's platform is an open-source operating system, which means developers can use and build on top of it for no cost.

Google argues this means it opens up competition.

But consumer groups said curbs on these companies' power in different nations "currently assist enterprises to develop and giving customers more options".

"Their dominance is now causing real harm by limiting options for consumers and competition for companies," stated a consumer advocate.

Thomas Roberts
Thomas Roberts

Award-winning journalist with a passion for human rights and investigative reporting across diverse cultures.